domingo, 23 de diciembre de 2007

Luke 19-24

The first difference I see in this ending with the other gospels is that Pilate said that he was going to let Jesus go. He never gave them the choice of Jesus or Barabbas. The multitude in fact insists on Jesus being crucified. Next comes his resurrection. In the two previous gospels he appears before them on a hill, while in this one he walks with two people along a path. Next, as the apostles are eating dinner, he appears again before them.

Overall, I like this gospel much better than the other ones. I found that it was more fun to read, and its differences made it better. I hope there are also other changes in the next gospels that make Christ's story more interesting.

sábado, 22 de diciembre de 2007

Luke Books 11-18

I once again see a common cliché that is used in many movies. Luke 11:23 "He that is not with me is against me…" The following line is the reason that religion has so much control, and why I think it is ridiculous. Luke 12:5 "But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him." Religion, in this case Christianity, is a celestial dictatorship which doesn't allow you to think what you want. It has an invisible surveillance system which is always watching, and if you do not do according to what it says, you will not only die, but suffer eternal damnation in a place full of fire. Yes, it controls people and gives them a sense of safety, but it also does the opposite. It restrains your thoughts and keeps you constantly afraid. This line proves it completely.

I like what Jesus says about humbling yourself and eventually you will rise. I also like his idea that it's better to heal a sinner or make him become good then just preach to a bunch of good people.

viernes, 21 de diciembre de 2007

Luke Books 6-10

Why was Simon named Peter? Why did Jesus change his name? Why would his original name change anything?

Mary Magdalene appears for the first time in these pages before Jesus' resurrection. It says that seven devils were taken out of her, but that's all; no prostitute, no wife, nothing. Even though at first this gospel was more exciting, it has turned monotonous like the other ones. They all say the same thing and the only reason I liked the gospel of Luke better was because it was different at first.

jueves, 20 de diciembre de 2007

Luke Books 1-5

The format of this gospel is different, and it even starts in first person. It seems that it is a letter to some Theophilius; like a story sort of. It starts with the story of a baby that appears to be John the Baptist and apparently something similar happened with him like Jesus. Then it goes to Jesus' story but keeps the two intertwined. This is more like in a story format and is thus less monotonous. I like this gospel a lot better. It also first mentions the Romans. The two gospels before only slightly mentioned the Romans in the end of the story; when Jesus is crucified. It also gives a specific time period.

It also goes back to a lot of the stories from the Gospel of Matthew; things like his lineage, all the Devil's temptations and so forth.

Mark Books 11-16

I had read this in the Book of Matthew, but didn't really remember where it was from. In the summer before 8th grade, I read a book about the crusades in which the main character's horse was named Hosanna. Even though I don't understand why they chant this in the bible, I now understand why they named the horse Hosanna. The scribes mentioned are like extremists now days. They use religion for power and mostly use it to excuse behavior that would be wrong under normal circumstances.

After having read two of the Gospels, I thought they would be more personal. Maybe they would tell the stories from their point of view or how they saw it. However, to me it seems that the story is just repeated with little or no changes. Why are there so many gospels that I assume, after reading two of them, say the same thing?

Mark Books 1-10

The hating of Jesus starts much earlier in the Book of Mark than in the Book of Matthew. I guess because it is shorter, but the entire thing seems to be less great or less complete than the first gospel. There also seems to be more of an order in which he gets his disciples. In the Book of Matthew, it just randomly says he had twelve disciples after barely mentioning the fishermen. A lot of the stories are the same, and Jesus repeats the wine thing to explain why his disciples do not fast.

"The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath." I really like this line because I agree with it. A lot of people blindly follow not only religion but other things as well without any concern for their own well-being. People have to start realizing that the only reality is what you know, so even if you are going to worship a god, you must realize that you come first. Always try to be happy first, and then do the rest.

There is no mention of Jarius' daughter in Matthew. I'm guessing that all of these gospels are just trying to convey the message that he healed people. Surely they will each have different stories. I've also come to understand that Jesus' disciples are idiots just like everyone else. The only thing that makes them difference is the simple fact that Jesus chose them to follow him around. In reality though, anyone could've been a disciple.

Mark 9:35 "For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it." I can easily see how this was used later on in any of the religious wars that were started by Christians. It was so easy for men in power to manipulate these words in order to manipulate men.

I don't get why he is referred to as The Son of man and The Son of God. Although I understand he's supposed to deliver God's message to men, why does he call himself both? One thing that really pisses me off is that while Jesus goes around calling all the scribes hypocrites, he is a huge hypocrite himself.

Every time he heals someone he tells them not to tell anyone. He even tells his disciples not to tell of his great actions. However, shouldn't he stop healing people if he really doesn't want word to get out about his greatness? I'll use a kind of bad analogy. If I invite some people over my house, but tell them not to tell anyone, when more people than expected come, I throw them out of my house. I don't let them in and tell them not to tell. It's the same with Christ. I get being modest, but come on.

lunes, 17 de diciembre de 2007

Matthew 23-28

The first thing which I have been thinking about because of the times is that there is no date to specify Jesus' birth. When did it become common to celebrate his birth on the 25th of December? In fact, there isn't even a Jewish calendar date for his birth. Perhaps it is mentioned in the other gospels. Secondly, knowing what eventually occurred because of Jesus, I find it funny that when he preaches all these people to be hypocrites, he has no idea that in the future, people do even bigger hypocrisies in his name.

The Last Supper appears in these pages, and I didn't know that it was actually the Passover meal. There are a couple of things that are confusing however. When they say high priests, are they Jewish high priests, or pagan high priests of the Roman Empire? It is never clear whether the people who kill him are Jews or Romans. After reading more, I now understand the situation. It was the Jewish men and priests that wanted to kill Jesus, but they needed the Romans to do it. It's also curious that Judas hangs himself after he sees what will happen to Jesus. Didn't he know what he was getting himself into? He literally sold Jesus for thirty silver pieces.

In the end, I recognize a lot of things. The first is of course, Mary Magdalene. I read "The Da Vinci Code," which states that Mary Magdalene wasn't in fact a prostitute, but Jesus' wife. While she appears here, there is no mention of either. The second is "el padre, el hijo y el espiritu santo." I understand that it comes when Jesus tells his disciples what to preach and how to continue his teachings.

martes, 11 de diciembre de 2007

Matthew Books 13-22

I really am starting to like how Jesus shuts up all the people who are offended by his teachings. He finds real sins that aren't considered sins and says that little things like not washing your hands before eating bread aren't really sins. I also like when he says that you have to have faith. In my own words, it's like the bible is telling us that nothing is really impossible. If you truly believe in something, then it will happen. I like that to a certain extent, but walking on water, come on…I also didn't know that Peter also walked on the sea. Even though it was only for a short moment, he also did what Jesus could do and my interpretation is that he only didn't last as long because he didn't have as much faith as Jesus. It seems that towards the end the disciples start to ask a lot of questions. They kind of seem lost now that they now that Jesus was going to be killed. It reminds me of the movie Mean Girls, when the two friends start following Katie around when Regina is no longer at the head. They seem lost and they turn to the next best thing. I wonder where the disciples will turn after the death of Christ.

The chief priests and Pharisees being afraid of the multitude when they want to put their hands on Christ is perfectly foreshadowing everything that will happen when the Church comes into power. Everyone is scared of the Church because of its power and thus do nothing. Just like these Pharisees and chief priests cannot touch Jesus, no one will dare do bad against the Church for the same reason.

Matthew Books 1-12

Before reading this, I thought that Mary was of the line of David. It turns out, that her husband, Joseph was. Why is Jesus then of noble descent? If indeed his father is God, then he's just a normal person with God for a father. If Joseph's blood was never in Jesus, then he is not the descendant of the kings of Israel. Make up your mind. Is he divine or is from kingly descendants? Technically, not that I actually believe that God was his father; he can't be of the royal line of David. It's like if my parents got a divorce (god forbid) and one of them married someone of royal descendants, would I be of the royal blood line? NO! Thus, either Jesus was of the royal line but was the biological son of Joseph, or he's divine but simply the son of Mary.

Apart from the fact that I think that it's all bull crap that Jesus is the son of God, I really like what he preaches. Turn the other cheek, if you've already thought about committing adultery, you have already committed it and so forth. It's really good stuff. I can see why the Jews eventually get mad. His preaching goes completely against the Ten Commandments. I also started thinking though, did God want this? Did He want his son going around telling people to stray from the laws that he already put down? Even if his teachings were noble and towards good, was God happy with what he was doing? Is Jesus a rebel son?

domingo, 9 de diciembre de 2007

Tao Te Ching 44-64

The book is starting to stress more and more wu-wei. It isn't in not doing, but in not being greedy, not wanting excess things; things like that. I now understand the reason for why wu-wei is so important. "The world is ruled by letting things take their course. It cannot be ruled by interfering."

I love book 50. It says that he who knows how to live has no place for death to enter. Thus, that person cannot be wounded in battle, killed by a tiger or rhinoceros. The way of the Tao is being simple. Don't have too many things. Value the small things in life. "It is not wise to rush about. Controlling the breath causes strain. If too much energy is used, exhaustion follows." I like this because I have started to realize this lately by myself. There is no reason to run if you aren't playing sports. It only causes you to get more stressed. It isn't good at all.

"Rule a nation with justice. Wage war with surprise moves. Become master of the universe without striving." This is really similar to the Analects when Confucius really stresses being a ruler without forcing it and being just. The fact that greatness starts from little things is also heavily pronounced in these books. The book says that everything starts from the little things. These little things are what will eventually achieve greatness.

jueves, 6 de diciembre de 2007

Tao Te Ching 29-43

In book 29, we see once again how one of the main themes is taking it easy and letting things flow. "So sometimes things are ahead and sometimes they are behind; sometimes breathing is hard, sometimes it comes easily…" In book 30, the Tao Te Ching is similar to Confucian teachings in that they both say that a ruler cannot rule through strength. From this we can learn to be peaceful and to always try to be a leader without forcing people.

Like I said before, the Yin-Yang has to be from Daoism. As I have read on, all the sayings seem to lead to a good and an evil; a whole coming from two parts. "The low is the foundation of the high." "The ten thousand things carry yin and embrace yang. They achieve harmony by combining these forces." There's my proof. All my thoughts were prior to reading that line, and it makes perfect sense.

miércoles, 5 de diciembre de 2007

Tao Te Ching 13-28

I don't know whether the Yin-Yang is from Daoism, but these pages stress a lot the complete whole that is achieved with the good and bad sides. "Know the white, but keep the black!" I'm beginning to feel that it is one of the main teachings, and in order to follow the Tao, you must be aware of this. "Yield and overcome; bend and be straight; empty and be full; wear out and be new; have little and gain; have much and be confused."

I like what it says in book 13 about misfortune being the human condition. I believe that to be very true. We have to accept it as unavoidable and unpredictable. We have to; going back to the Yin-Yang thing, take the good with the bad. In book 19, we see the concept of wu-wei once again. It isn't actually not doing or not acting, but it talks about giving up things. It talks about not striving to do things but letting them come naturally.

lunes, 3 de diciembre de 2007

Tao Te Ching: 1-12

In the first I noticed a similarity to Judaism. The name that can be said is not the eternal name. Kind of like Yaweh. You aren't supposed to say that name so you say Hashem. I don't know whether any one ever noticed before, but the theory of Relativity came way before Einstein. "All can know good as good only because there is evil." I find it amazing that this comes up. Books 3-5 are extremely confusing. What I can extract, however, is that Tao is greater than the gods. There is some difference between heaven and Earth that I can't really comprehend but is there.
It's cool that they give a lot of importance to a woman spirit. In a lot of religions women seem to be much inferior to men. "No fight. No blame." I like the passage that talks about the Primal Virtue. It basically says that you have to try and not do bad things in good situations. It is a werird explination, but that's my interpretation. Another big quality seems to be instinct. To stop taking percious things and value only what you need.

domingo, 2 de diciembre de 2007

"Go" Game

The flash that is required to play the game simply wouldn't work in my house. Thus, I didn't get to complete the lecture, but from what I played in class, I think it is a great game.
It reminds me a little of the game Othello, where you also use black and white pieces on a board. All the strategies and rules are amazing, and it's cool to think how they invented it. How did they come up with the thought?

martes, 27 de noviembre de 2007

Night Blog #2

Of all the holocaust stories that I have read so far, this is the most realistic. A rabbi that stops believing in God after what he has seen seems incredible. I like it a lot. I think it's dumb to look to God for salvation and what not after bad things have happened. How can people still say "In God we trust" after 9/11? It's ridiculous.
Eliezer and his father are extremely lucky. They got saved from really tough situations by simply being cunning. It also could've easily led to their deaths, so I guess it wasn't really all that smart.
Throughout the entire book it seems Eliezer does everything to stay with his father and stick together. However, towards the end, when his dad begins to die, I found it curious that Eliezer begins feeling relieved. It must have been terribly hard to face this situation and know that you're helpless. All he could do was try to save himself.

Night Blog #1

Going in I didn't know that Night was going to be a book about the holocaust. Being a Jew myself, these stories always get to me. The anti-semitisim and all the terrible stories strike me deep inside. In another way, I have realized through what I have read that they should've acted. They don't believe Moshe when he tells the town of what the Nazis are doing. They show even more disbelieve when Madame Schachter begins to scream about a fire. They comfort themselves saying that she's crazy.
Even though I have heard these stories before, the pain and suffering gets to me everytime. When Eliezer begins to question why he is still praying to God is one of my favorite moments. Obviously it's not a happy moment, but I find it ridiculous that people could still not only believe in but pray to a God in times of suffering like that.

lunes, 26 de noviembre de 2007

The Analects as a whole work

I really enjoyed reading the Analects. I learned a lot of Confucian values, and also, I learned how much music was appreciated. While it is only a side topic to Goodness, Virtue, and being a gentleman, Confucius regards music very highly and even says you achieve perfection through it. Being a person who cannot live without music, I was very happy to read this. It made me feel that it is indeed one of the most important things in life, that it isn't just a way to get rid of stress or something to dance to.

I really like the fact that the people in the Analects discuss different aspects of LIFE, and do not even mention God. This is what I'm starting to get into; analyzing life without really trying to explain it through an absolute. I also think that it is a little too harsh. It seems as though people who weren't necessarily Good or didn't have that much Virtue wasn't really a gentleman. I think there are thousands of qualities that define you and the fact that they base it on such little things is irrational.

Confucius Books 9, 10, 16, 19, 20

In book 9, when Confucius becomes gravely ill, his disciples go to his bedside and pretend to be his ministers. Confucius then says that they don't need to fool him, and if he doesn't deserve ministers, then let there not be. Was he not hugely important? Why weren't there ministers by his side?

We can see with these pages that Confucius is an extremely respectful man. In book 16 Confucius talks about befriending people. Even though he says it's good to befriend people of desirable qualities, isn't the simple principle of befriending people in that way wrong? I love the amount of affection Confucius shows towards music. He regards it as one of the highest things, and I believe everyone should.

domingo, 25 de noviembre de 2007

Confucius Books 15,17,18

In book 15, Confucius says that one shouldn't judge by what other people say. Whether a whole town loves or hates a person, one should decide alone if they like the person or not. In book 17, Confucius talks about people being similar. I believe that this is a huge point that we have to look at because he lived in a time where there was slavery all over the world. Even though there might not have been in China per say, it was still relevant. There's also a debate over the mourning period. Everyone mourns three years, but when someone wants to mourn one year, it is frowned upon. Confucius says that it is three years because you are helpless without your parents for three years. Even though that is true, I really don't think that means you have to mourn them for three years.

Confucius Books 12-14

In book 12, Confucius talks a lot about government. Confucius 12.7 "Simply make sure that there is sufficient food, sufficient armaments, and that you have the confidence of the common people." He was then asked which he would give up first, he said armaments. Second, Confucius replied food. This means that above all things, Confucius believed a governor should always have the confidence of the common people. Now a days this isn't really the case, and I wish it was. All the modern leaders should read this line.
In book 13, I found a modern cliche. Analects 13.16 "The master said (act so that) those near to you are pleased and those who are far from you are drawn closer." The cliche is not verbatim, but I think the common saying "keep your friends close but your enemies closer" sort of resembles this line from the Analects. The family first motto also comes in through this book. Confucius stresses this point a lot and it's one of his basic teachings.
In book 14, Confucius begins to talk about people behind their backs. While he doesn't necessarily say anything that bad, we finally see a flaw in a man who was so into goodness and what not.

jueves, 15 de noviembre de 2007

Confucius-Books 7,8,11

In book 7 of the Analects it is the first time that there is a narrator. Before it was simply "and the master said…" Now it is actually saying things about Confucius in narration form. Also, I noticed that he is a harsh teacher. He says that if he says the first corner of a problem and the pupil cannot say the other three, then he will not teach him. Wouldn't a person who is so involved with goodness and what not actually be willing to help someone with these difficulties?

In book 8 Confucius says that you achieve perfection through music. As a person who loves every kind of music and would die without it, I am really happy to see this in such a major text. I find it really cool that Confucius would say this when he lived, and I actually think it now.

"'May I enquire about death?' 'You do not yet understand life-how could you possibly understand death?'" (Confucius Book 11.12.) I think that this line is really important. I personally ask a lot of questions to myself about death. I wonder what happens, why, where you go; every question you could imagine. It is true though, why do I ask about death if I have no idea what life is. I really don't understand life. I don't understand reality and the universe. A lot of these questions will never be answered, and frankly, they're depressing. We have to live our lives without letting the answers to these questions bother us. It is always important to ask, but it could be damaging.

Paraphrasing Exercise

1. "The Antarctic is the vast source of cold on our planet, just as the sun is the source of our heat, and it exerts tremendous control on our climate," [Jacques] Cousteau told the camera. "The cold ocean water around Antarctica flows north to mix with warmer water from the tropics, and its upwellings help to cool both the surface water and our atmosphere. Yet the fragility of this regulating system is now threatened by human activity." From "Captain Cousteau," Audubon (May 1990):17.

The Antarctic is the biggest cold producer on Earth. The cold mixes with the heat around the planet and creates a perfect balance in the climate. However, recent damage from humans is endangering this resource. From "Captain Cousteau," Audubon (May 1990):17.

2. The twenties were the years when drinking was against the law, and the law was a bad joke because everyone knew of a local bar where liquor could be had. They were the years when organized crime ruled the cities, and the police seemed powerless to do anything against it. Classical music was forgotten while jazz spread throughout the land, and men like Bix Beiderbecke, Louis Armstrong, and Count Basie became the heroes of the young. The flapper was born in the twenties, and with her bobbed hair and short skirts, she symbolized, perhaps more than anyone or anything else, America's break with the past. From Kathleen Yancey, English 102 Supplemental Guide (1989): 25.

In the early 20th century, alcohol was outlawed in the U.S. Just like today people get away with selling and consuming drugs, people in the 20´s always knew where to get a drink. During this decade, the police weren´t a big factor, and they could basically do nothing about the different mobs and mafia that controlled the cities. This was also the decade of a big music change. It seems that in the 1920´s, people stopped listening to the classics and started supporting the new jazz movement. Eventually, the big jazz artists of the time became a huge influence to the younger people. This decade was in fact when America wasa noted to transition from the past into the present. From Kathleen Yancey, English 102 Supplemental Guide (1989): 25.

3. Of the more than 1000 bicycling deaths each year, three-fourths are caused by head injuries. Half of those killed are school-age children. One study concluded that wearing a bike helmet can reduce the risk of head injury by 85 percent. In an accident, a bike helmet absorbs the shock and cushions the head. From "Bike Helmets: Unused Lifesavers," Consumer Reports (May 1990): 348.

Every year, 75% of the huge amount of bicycling deaths each year are caused by blows to the head. About 50% of these dead people are in fact just kids, kids who are still studying in their local elementary, middle, or high school. A study showed that the use of the bike helmet can reduce the risk of these blows to the head by a great percentage. In case of a fall, this helmet takes in the blow that your head would if you didn´t wear it, and it keeps your head safe from injury. From "Bike Helmets: Unused Lifesavers," Consumer Reports (May 1990): 348.

4. Matisse is the best painter ever at putting the viewer at the scene. He's the most realistic of all modern artists, if you admit the feel of the breeze as necessary to a landscape and the smell of oranges as essential to a still life. "The Casbah Gate" depicts the well-known gateway Bab el Aassa, which pierces the southern wall of the city near the sultan's palace. With scrubby coats of ivory, aqua, blue, and rose delicately fenced by the liveliest gray outline in art history, Matisse gets the essence of a Tangier afternoon, including the subtle presence of the bowaab, the sentry who sits and surveys those who pass through the gate. From Peter Plagens, "Bright Lights." Newsweek (26 March 1990): 50.

Matisse is the greatest of his time at creating the world of his painting inside his viewer´s heads. Of all the new artists, his art is the most life-like. Using all diferent kinds of colors and painting schemes, Matisse can re-create a huge number of scenes and actually capture their essence. From Peter Plagens, "Bright Lights." Newsweek (26 March 1990): 50.

5. While the Sears Tower is arguably the greatest achievement in skyscraper engineering so far, it's unlikely that architects and engineers have abandoned the quest for the world's tallest building. The question is: Just how high can a building go? Structural engineer William LeMessurier has designed a skyscraper nearly one-half mile high, twice as tall as the Sears Tower. And architect Robert Sobel claims that existing technology could produce a 500-story building. From Ron Bachman, "Reaching for the Sky." Dial (May 1990): 15.

Even after creating the mighty Sears Tower in Chicago, Illinois, which stands the highest of all skyscrapers in the United States, there is no way that the people who construct buildings of its kind, have given up in trying to build an even taller one. Engineers have designed edifices that stand up to 800 meters to buildings of 500 floors. They claim that modern technology could in theory make these stand, but they still don´t know the limits of skyscraper building. From Ron Bachman, "Reaching for the Sky." Dial (May 1990): 15.

martes, 13 de noviembre de 2007

Confucius: Books 4-6

In book 4 Confucius talks a lot about goodness. A lot of the things he says pretty much are modern day lessons which people apply or at least try to. Don't look for something when being good, let it come from inside and what not.
I don't understand what it takes to be good in Confucius' eyes. He doesn't really say that any one is good, yet I think they are. What do people have to do to cross that line?
I liked a part of Book 5 when Confucius realizes that it will do no good to reprimand Zigong for napping. He says that even if he punishes him, it will cause nothing. He learned that you first have to talk and listen and then criticize. I wish my parents did that sometimes.

lunes, 12 de noviembre de 2007

Confucius: Books 1-3

I remember learning that Confucianism was not a religion but more a way of life; kind of like Buddhism. However, so far all of what we've read are discussions between Confucius, whom I assume is the master, and some other guys. They discuss all kinds of things from how to pray to how to be a good person. I like it. They are saying and discussing what they think about life and how they live it. I also like that there is no God involved. I like theories and analizations to be about life and things like that but leaving God out of it.

lunes, 5 de noviembre de 2007

Job 12-end

In these pages it seems that men start to analize God and his actions. In all the other stories we've read, it appears that humans simply accept God because they have been told to and because their families do. However, after God tortures Job, why shouldn't he start to question him? In these chapters, Job talks to different men about what his facing, and it's the first appearence of someone analyzing not only God, but life.
I started thinking about all the people who are missing some analyzing now a days. With all the bad things happening in the world, don't religious people and God-fearing people ever think about why these things happen? I know that personally, I stopped believing in God for this reason. I just started to think about all the bad things that happen and why God doesn't do anything about it. Plus, why would you want to believe in a God who destroys his best follower and best citizen to test him?

jueves, 1 de noviembre de 2007

Job Chapters 1-11

As I read these pages, a thought occurred to me that I would have never thought possible. In these pages, God is possesed by Satan. Everything is fine between God and Job until Satan tells God to test him by first taking away his possesions and children, and then finally attacking Job himself. Is God not supposed to be superior to Satan? Another thing has also to do with the same thing. Why would God hurt Job? It is ridiculous that God hurt the most perfect person in the world.

lunes, 29 de octubre de 2007

Samuel Book 2- Chapter 1-12

"Oh how the mighty have fallen"

When Mr.Tangen told us that most of the modern American cliche's come from the KJV Bible, I believed him because well, he is the teacher. However, up to this point I hadn't recognized any modern cliche's. Samuel 1:25 "How are the mighty fallen in the midst of the battle! O Jonathan thou wast slain in thine high places." Finally a known cliche. It's also weird that all these modern cliches come from the Bible. It's weird because of the different contexts in which they appear, and it's just weird to hear that phrase in the Bible.

domingo, 28 de octubre de 2007

Samuel Book 1-Chapter 18-30

Seeing how this is a lot of reading, there are a couple of things I want to say.

First of all, I had always thought that David was the son of Saul. However, according to the bible, he is the son of Jesse, the Beth-lehemite. Not only is he not Saul's son, but it turns out that Saul despises David because of his jealousy. That kind of reminds me of Hera, and her hate for Zeus' lovers.
Secondly, in regards to the size of Goliath, I always thought that he was really about 6'7 or something and only seemed a giant because of the shortness of people in the past. It turns out, when I did the conversion from cubits to feet, that Goliath was at least 9 feet tall according to the bible. Therefore, if this story is true, Goliath was a giant.
Thirdly, I always thought that David became king in a time of crisis when Goliath terrorized the city. In reality, according to the bible, Goliath was nothing but a soldier. He was just part of a war between the Philistines and the Israelites. It reminds me of the movie, TROY, when Agammemnon calls Achilles to fight against the giant from the enemy. Even though it's different because David wasn't the incredible, half-god soldier that Achilles was, it is pretty much the same concept.
Another thought that I had while reading this occurred to me in the part when Saul gives his daughter to David to wed. This is not the first time in literature that this happpens. In a lot of old books, a worthy warrior or noble who has done something incredible gets the King's daughter's hand in marriage. However, supposing these stories were real of course, what if the princess was ugly? What if she was unkind and simply impossible to be around? Could the said person reject the princess? Could he be able to tell the King that he can't marry his daughter?

miércoles, 24 de octubre de 2007

Barak Obama: A good speaker?

I believe that Obama is a good speaker by the standards we set today. He is clear in his speech, and he uses a lot of hand gestures and facial gestures. He looks at everyone in the crowd and his voice just makes you believe him. On top of that, his dynamism is excellent, and he changes his tone quite often to express different things.

martes, 23 de octubre de 2007

Exodus Books 13-40

These pages are extremely repetitive. I'm sorry to say that I could not enjoy the reading in the least bit. 4 cubits for this and 10 cubits for that. I understand the fact that God was precise in his instruction but, what sort of message is delivered here? What sort of lesson can be drawn from simple instructions and measurements.
The important parts, however, are really interesting. The fact that the Jews are basically given their laws in the middle of the desert is interesting. All the punishments and laws that would later be part of Israel are shown in these chapters. Additionally, it is incredible that a lot of these things have lasted until today. I still do the Passover feast, I know people who do literally NOTHING on Saturdays because of Shabbat, and the 10 commandments are still used today as well.

lunes, 22 de octubre de 2007

Exodus Books 1-12

Being Jewish, I have to hear this story once a year during the Passover holliday. However, in the dinner, the "hagaddah", or the story everyone reads, has some differences from what is actually written. All my life I thought that we ate unleavened bread, also known as matzah, because the Jews didn't have time to bake the bread as they were leaving Egypt. While that is true, the reason why we have to eat matzah and nothing with yeast in it, is simply because, well, God said so. Before their actual exodus from Egypt, he told his people of the Passover feast.
Another thing that I found interesting after I read this, is that there is no mention of Moses' sister, Miriam. In the Passover holliday, Miriam is one of the main characters in the story. Why then is she not mentioned in the real text? Why was she used in the hagaddah?

domingo, 21 de octubre de 2007

Genesis Books 11-28

In these chapters, we can clearly see the wrath of God. If God was a person that I just met, I wouldn't really like him. The fear of God is what I believe drives religion, and it all started from these moments. I understand God wanting to know if Abraham was truly loyal, but there was no need to put him through the task of almost killing his own son. It is preposterous to test someone's loyalty in that form, even if you are God.
Another thing I found interesting was the incredible contact between God and people back then. If this is real, why did he talk so much to people back then and not today? Do people who claim to talk to God actually do? It's interesting to note that we no longer think it possible for that to happen. I'm not in favor of believing people who say they talk and see God, but that's because I don't believe in God. However, why do God fearing people think it so ridiculous that someone can talk to God? I think that that disbelief is what shows what everyone truly believes. Could someone truly believe in God if they are unwilling to admit the fact that someone could possibly interact with him?

jueves, 18 de octubre de 2007

Fallacies in "I Have A Dream"

I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.

Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.

But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. And so we've come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.

In a sense we've come to our nation's capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the "unalienable Rights" of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked "insufficient funds."

But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.

We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of Now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children.

It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro's legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. And those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. And there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.

But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.
The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. And they have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.
We cannot walk alone.

And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.
We cannot turn back.

There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. *We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their self-hood and robbed of their dignity by a sign stating: "For Whites Only."* We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until "justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream."¹

I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. And some of you have come from areas where your quest -- quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed.

Let us not wallow in the valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends.
And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of "interposition" and "nullification" -- one day right there in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight; "and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together."²

This is our hope, and this is the faith that I go back to the South with.

With this faith, we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

And this will be the day -- this will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with new meaning:
My country 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing.
Land where my fathers died, land of the Pilgrim's pride,
From every mountainside, let freedom ring!

And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true.
And so let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire.
Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York.
Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.
Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.
Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California.
But not only that:
Let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia.
Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee.
Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi.
From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

And when this happens, when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual:
Free at last! Free at last!
Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!³

miércoles, 17 de octubre de 2007

Genesis Books 6-11

These chapters are the world reknown story of Noah and his ark. It is important to me because when I had my Bar Mitzvah, I had to read this story from the actual Torah. Many things have changed since then, but the biggest change is that I no longer believe in God as I did when I was thirteen. However, I think that my analysis of the story back then is still the same as it is today, with the exception that I no longer believe in God like I used to. However, after reading it again, I realize that there is no difference in what we can extract from this story, just the simple fact that I am no longer completely convinced that God is real.
Almost exactly two years ago, I was able to learn something from this story, and I realize it even more today. God(if there is a God) is NOT going to destroy the Earth or flood it or however else anyone thinks that we will be punished. However, without realizing it, we, the human race, could easily bring an end to the Earth. Global Warming, war, and poverty are slowly but surely consuming our Earth by the second and only the rich have an ark. What if we were REALLY all the same? What if we all had the same amount of money, education, and all other differences that occur this day in age in society? If that happened then none of us would get saved. I personally don't think that's the end any of us want to go to, but if we don't act fast, it just might happen. We are rotting. Every minute of every day we spend neglecting that fact only makes it worse. There will be no ark this time, there will be no warning. That is why we have to prevent it at all costs and start making the Earth a better place. Even though that sentence is the biggest cliche of our time, I cannot help but realizing that it is true.

martes, 16 de octubre de 2007

Genesis Books 1-5

I found it both interesting and surprising that we are given a pretty precise location of where Eden supposedly was. Why is it that no one has found it yet? I am sure people have gone on expeditions, it is just surprising that nothing has turned up. Additionally, I find it ridiculous that all the men mentioned lived until they were on average 900 years old. Scientifically, and I know we're supposed to analyze and get out of our scientific thoughts, people lived much shorter lives the farther you go back in history. Maybe it is a metaphor to tell us that when humanity was good, and there was peace in the world, people lived longer or something of the sort.
In terms of how it is written, I personally believe that it is too repetitive. I have never read the Bible before, and so far I like it.

domingo, 30 de septiembre de 2007

Medea: In the name of love?

Medea, the wife of Jason, as we learn from the myth, was a sorceress. She used her powers for good when she made Jason's father older, but what about her evil actions. According to the myth, as the Argonauts were leaving the kingdom of the Colchis, Medea took her brother and murdered him. She left his bones behind, and when her chasing father saw his murdered son, he stopped his vessels and the Greeks got away. She was also very evil when she killed Jason's uncle, Pelias when his daughters wanted her to make him younger as well. Yes, these actions are atrocious, but I belive Medea commited these murders for love. Would she have killed her own brother had she not been forced to stall her pursuing father? Would she have killed Pelias if he hadn't refused Jason the throne in the first place? Obviously she could've found other ways to escape and get her revenge, but when an occasion arises, you never know what you'll do.

Jason and the Argonauts

What I found really different in this myth was the time specification. In all the other myths I have read up to this point, there is no reference whatsoever to time or even a time period, something I find a bit confusing at times. With this myth we get a little insight into the chronological order of the myths.
Another thing that I found interesting was Jason's father giving up the throne to his brother. Why on Earth, especially in times when the king's word was absolute and pretty much everyone who wasn't a noble lived like crap, would you give up the seed of power? When I got to thinking, however, maybe this is a metaphor that is supposed to teach us a lesson; one which I believe every rich person on Earth should learn. I think it is teaching us that Jason's father wanted to live a normal life and didn't need all the accomodations and riches that went along with his previous place in society. So, why do we, in modern times, choose to live with 80 inch plasma TV's, Ferraris, or cellphones that basically replace your computer? Pop culture, which many people think affects only the U.S., actually affects the whole world because of the United State's influence. Thus, people all over the world feel the need to be seen with the newest, most expensive luxuries. Let's be serious here, why do you need such a fast car when the speed limit doesn't let you go even half the car's speed? Why do you need a TV that covers an entire wall? At the end of the day, the people that you want to impress so badly don't even care about you, and if they do, it is often times just for your money. We need to start to appreciate the small things in life, and not try so much to impress.

jueves, 27 de septiembre de 2007

Etymology Chase

ETYMOLOGY CHASE: If internet use goes with definition, word is in green. If not, it is in red.

Labyrinth: (my definition) A maze or enigma; a puzzle.
Internet Use: "Treated for Illness, Then Lost in Labyrinth of Bills." That is the name of the article. The article is about a woman who suffers from a type of cancer but at a point considered stopping treatment because the treatment required so much paperwork. She was lost in bills and paperwork which basically does go with my definition.


Palladium: (dictionary definition) A safeguard, especially one viewed as a guarantee of the integrity of social institutions.
Internet Use: "Microsoft recently announced Palladium, a plan for creating secure computing platforms." Since the plan is for creating secure computin platforms, it goes with the definition of safeguard.

Museum: (my definition) Place where historic articles or pieces of art are kept and displayed to the public.
Internet Use: "Jacques Chirac created a museum devoted to African, Asian, Oceanic and pre-Columbian art at Quai Branly beside the Eiffel Tower." This says that the museum is devoted to the art of those different places, so it matches my definition.

Narcissism: (my definition) To be in love with one's self.
Internet Use: "That doesn’t make him any different from any other bubble boy with a fat paycheck and the slavish attention of a media that mocks his narcissism by publishing articles about his narcissism." This is talking about a movie director in an article about the film "Lady in the Water." This sort of does go with my definition because it talks about how the media makes fun of how he displays himself in movies. It doesn't directly say that the director is in love with himself, but the article is making the point that he puts a lot of himself in his films, and thus by portraying himself, it kind of goes with my definition.

Odyssey: (my definition) A long journey containing many obstacles; an adventure.
Internet Use: "A Fly-Fisherman’s Odyssey" That is the name of the article in which a fisherman goes fishing in the streams where Homer's nymphs were supposed to be. It is about how he doesn't find fish in one river so he heads to another and so forth. It was an adventure for him, and thus it goes perfectly with my definition of the word.

Meander: (my definition) Wandering around in search for something.
Internet Use: "A newly created 25,668-acre nature preserve along the Little Pee Dee River in South Carolina allows visitors to meander among spooky trees and chilly black water." In an article about South Carolina touring, the word meander, by the context, seems like it means to walk around/wander. It doesn't necessarily specify to look for something, but I hit it right in the wandering part.

Protean: (my definition) Heroic; adventurous
Internet Use: "But it has a formal freedom unprecedented in Johnson's public works, as if he has found an esthetic sufficiently protean to express his promiscuous love of shapes." By the context, I can't really tell what protean means, but it doesn't look like it means heroic or adventurous.
Actual Meaning: Readily assuming different forms or characters; extremely variable;
changeable in shape or form, as an amoeba. This definition goes with the context perfectly, and I understand how the author used it.

Stoical: (my definition) Showing no emotion; plain
Internet Use: "More and more, the shrewdest thinkers and artists are precocious archeologists of ... ruins-in-the-making, indignant or stoical diagnosticians of defeat, enigmatic choreographers of the complex spiritual movements useful for individual survival in an era or permanent apocalypse." Although this sentence doesn't really show the definition by the context, it could be what it means, and the dictionary defines stoical very similarly to what I defined it as.

Herculean: (my definition) Heroic; strong or capable.
Internet Use: "I don’t think anybody can say I haven’t made a Herculean effort," Selig said. Using the context, I beleive this could mean strong, and thus my definition is correct or close to what it is.

Laconic: (my definition) Using few words; brief
Internet Use: "Mr. Scott, slender and 6-foot-2, was as laconic off screen as he was in his westerns. ''Frankly, I don't like publicity,'' he said in a 1961 interview." This goes with my definition because he uses few words in the quote.

Zephyr: (my definition) A precious blue rock.
Internet Use: All articles in the New York Times that I could find didn't have Zephyr in the context of my definition. All the articles I found used Zephyr as a proper name.
Actual Definition: a gentle, mild breeze; (initial capital letter) Literary. the west wind.
any of various things of fine, light quality, as fabric, yarn, etc.

Nemesis: (my definition) Big enemy; opposite equal.
Internet Use: "A Nemesis of Matsuzaka May Intrigue the Yankees" This is the name of an article that talks about a first baseman that did exceptionally well against Daisuke Matsuzaka, a pitcher of the Boston Red Sox. The player is someone who does good against Matsuzaka, and is thus his rival or opposite equal.

Flora: (my definition) Plant life; trees, flowers, plants, etc.
Internet Use: "As the couple, who have an 11-year-old daughter, set out to remodel the bigger house, Ms. Russo hired a garden designer to help her identify the tangle of flora that grew around the houses and along a steep hillside." In the context, the word flora probably means plants, or bushes or something of the sort.

Ambrosia: (my definition) A type of plant; herb
Internet Use: "He often ordered two or three gin martinis first, so he was well oiled by the time the food came, and I always ordered the same thing: shrimp rémoulade, chicken Rochambeau and ambrosia." I believe this does match my definition because it is being used as a food, and an herb is eatable. While it probably is not the exact definition, I probably have something close.

Hermetic: (my definition) Temperature isolated.
Internet Use: "A hermetic seal is the main reason the Kim dynasty has survived so long. When I arrived at Pyongyang airport, I was obliged to hand over my cellphones and satellite phones, to be picked up on my departure. Even many senior government officials have no access to the Internet." This matches my definition in the isolated part. The context has nothing to do with temperature, but it is saying that North Korea is isolated from the world.

Promethean: (my definition) Someone who starts something; innovative.
Internet Use: "The audience needs to be told what operations of accident, fate and Promethean technological hubris caused a given mild-mannered misfit to acquire his monstrous and misunderstood gifts." In this context the word Promethean most probably means innovative or new.

Nectar: (my definition) The liquid that comes out of a flower; some type of juice.
Internet Use: "Now, in a mystery worthy of Agatha Christie, bees are flying off in search of pollen and nectar and simply never returning to their colonies." Bees eat the liquid that comes out of flowers, and that is called nectar as we cann see in this article.

Sibylline: (dictionary definition) Of, resembling, or characteristic of a sibyl; prophetic; oracular; mysterious or cryptic.
Internet Use: "Like many of the sibylline messages of mythology, these kinetic tidings were hauntingly mysterious." This matches the definition because it uses mysterious and talks about mythology, the two basic components that make up the definition of the word.

Tantalize: (my definition) To torture or tease.
Internet Use: "Photos of a Saturn Moon Both Tantalize and Confuse" This is the title of an article that talks about Saturn's Moon, Titan. Scientists are confused because of its appearence and are tantalized thinking there is life. Thus, they are being teased somewhat by what they see.

Delphic: (dictionary definition) Of or pertaining to Delphi. Of or pertaining to Apollo, or to his temples or oracles. (often lowercase) Oracular; obscure; ambiguous
Internet Use: " In short, he was Delphic, and his supporters and critics each ended the day saying his performance had hardened their enthusiasm or their doubts." I believe this matches the definition because it could be pertaining to the fact that he was ambigious or obscure.

Halycon: (dictionary definition) NOT FOUND...

Platonic: (my definition) Something that is very hard to accomplish; impossible
Internet Use: " Their friendship, however, seemed strengthened by remaining platonic." By the context of this sentence, it appears my definition is wrong.
Actual Definition: Purely spiritual; free from sensual desire, esp. in a relationship between two persons of the opposite sex.

Draconian: (my definition) Devilish or mean; also someone who is a very hard worker.
Internet Use: "The folks at MOFTB can be a bit draconian sometimes but they’re no dummies." In this sentence, the context tells us that draconian means either evil, mean, or any other word of that sort.

Calypso: (dictionary definition) A musical style of West Indian origin, influenced by jazz, usually having topical, often improvised, lyrics. To sing or dance to calypso.
Internet Use: "POP MUSIC; In Trinidad, 'Calypso Diplomacy' With a Beat" This is the title of an article about Trinidad. Since it uses Calypso and music in the same sentence, the definition must be correct.

Up to this point, all definitions are from the dictionary because my group and I didn't have enough time to get definitions for the rest of the words.

Amazon: A river in N South America, flowing E from the Peruvian Andes through N Brazil to the Atlantic Ocean: the largest river in the world in volume of water carried. 3900 mi. (6280 km) long.
Classical Mythology. one of a race of female warriors said to dwell near the Black Sea.
One of a fabled tribe of female warriors in South America.
A tall, powerful, aggressive woman.
Internet Use: "Most forests in the Amazon River basin grew greener in 2005 even as a potent drought caused the waterways in the region to shrivel to a 100-year low, scientists said in a paper published in the online journal ScienceExpress."

Siren: A seductively beautiful or charming woman, esp. one who beguiles men: a siren of the silver screen.
An acoustical instrument for producing musical tones, consisting essentially of a disk pierced with holes arranged equidistantly in a circle, rotated over a jet or stream of compressed air, steam, or the like, so that the stream is alternately interrupted and allowed to pass.
An implement of this kind used as a whistle, fog signal, or warning device.
Internet Use: "The Siren Song of Mali"

Mercurial: Changeable; volatile; fickle; flighty; erratic: a mercurial nature.
Animated; lively; sprightly; quick-witted.
Pertaining to, containing, or caused by the metal mercury.

Of or pertaining to the planet Mercury.
Internet Use: "Barry Bonds, the mercurial and sometimes temperamental Pittsburgh Pirates outfielder, admitted today that he unwittingly rubs many people the wrong way."

Procrustean: Tending to produce conformity by violent or arbitrary means.
Internet Use: "I am struck dumb (well, almost) by Carolyn Heilbrun's attempt to force not only ''Richard III'' but all of Shakespeare into her Procrustean bed of good women/evil men."

Aurora: Meteorology. a radiant emission from the upper atmosphere that occurs sporadically over the middle and high latitudes of both hemispheres in the form of luminous bands, streamers, or the like, caused by the bombardment of the atmosphere with charged solar particles that are being guided along the earth's magnetic lines of force.
Internet Use: "Invasive cane toads on the move, the far-flung impacts of El Niño, auroras on Mars and the lingering effects of arsenic."

Iridescent: Displaying a play of lustrous colors like those of the rainbow. –noun. An iridescent cloth, material, or other substance
Internet Use: "His ties have been dipped in colors unknown in these parts: iridescent violet, gold, peacock blue."

Panacea: A remedy for all disease or ills; cure-all. An answer or solution for all problems or difficulties.
Internet Use: "Few Expect a Panacea in a Rate Cut by the Fed"

Lethargy: (my definition) Laziness
Internet Use: "When Peter blackmails Senator Stiles to secure a House seat, Tim rouses himself from his lethargy to fight Peter politically."

Gorgons: A woman regarded as ugly or terrifying.
Internet Use: "Where snake-coiffed gorgons present themselves to wary hairdressers."

Harpies: A scolding, nagging, bad-tempered woman; shrew. A greedy, predatory person.
Internet Use: "Under Robert B. Sinclair's able direction, some excellent actresses give stingingly detailed pictures of some of the most odious harpies ever collected in one play"

Hydra: A persistent or many-sided problem that presents new obstacles as soon as one aspect is solved.
Internet Use: "The New York Waterway group is planning to buy a modern model, known as a Hydra-Terra, that is manufactured near Rochester, holds 45 passengers and costs about $200,000. "

Lycanthrope: A person affected with lycanthropy. A werewolf or alien spirit in the physical form of a bloodthirsty wolf.
Internet Use: "The son of fortune teller Maleva (Maria Ouspenskaya), Bela was a lycanthrope, or 'wolf man.' "

Martial: Inclined or disposed to war; warlike. Of, suitable for, or associated with war or the armed forces. Characteristic of or befitting a warrior.
Internet Use: "But “The Jaded Assassin,” Michael Voyer’s innovative martial-arts fantasy, is all about the battles."

Sophistry: A subtle, tricky, superficially plausible, but generally fallacious method of reasoning. A false argument; sophism.
Internet Use: "With more sophistry than poetry, Oliver Stone apotheosizes these trash archetypes in "Natural Born Killers," his supposed satire about an America despoiled by violence and exploitation."

Fauna: The animals of a given region or period considered as a whole. A treatise on the animals of a given region or period.
Internet Use: "On Madagascar, a Treasury of Fauna and Flora"

Stentorian: Very loud or powerful in sound.
Internet Use: "As a curator, Mr. Szarkowski loomed large, with a stentorian voice and a raconteurial style."

Pyrrhic: Of or relating to a war dance of ancient Greece; of or relating to or containing a metrical foot of two unstressed syllables; of or relating to or resembling Pyrrhus or his exploits (especially his sustaining staggering losses in order to defeat the Romans). A metrical unit with unstressed-unstressed syllables; an ancient Greek dance imitating the motions of warfare.
Internet Use: "MOMA's Pyrrhic Victory"

Victory: A success or triumph over an enemy in battle or war. An engagement ending in such triumph; the ultimate and decisive superiority in any battle or contest; a success or superior position achieved against any opponent, opposition, difficulty, etc.
Internet Use: " 'This is a spectacular victory for Microsoft,'' said David Yoffie, a professor at the Harvard Business School."

Gordian Knot: Pertaining to Gordius, ancient king of Phrygia, who tied a knot (the Gordian knot) that, according to prophecy, was to be undone only by the person who was to rule Asia, and that was cut, rather than untied, by Alexander the Great; resembling the Gordian knot in intricacy.
Internet Use: "I think members of my team listened to the president but did not hear him. And today I have cut the Gordian knot, however difficult it may be.' "

Pandora's Box: A source of extensive but unforeseen troubles or problems.
Internet Use: "Research on Embryos Opens a Pandora's Box"

Cassandra: A person who prophesies doom or disaster.
Internet Use: "You don't have to be a Cassandra to fear for the New York Times"

Sword of Damocles: An impending disaster.
Internet Use: "No matter what the union proposed short of the commissioner's position, he rejected it, knowing the Congressional sword hovered over the players' heads." I think sword is referring to the sword of Damocles.

Achilles Heel: A vulnerable point.
Internet Use: "Giuliani’s Achilles Heel: Immigration"

Oedipus Complex: The positive libidinal feelings of a child toward the parent of the opposite sex and hostile or jealous feelings toward the parent of the same sex that may be a source of adult personality disorder when unresolved.
Internet Use: "Howard G Schneiderman letter contends that before feminists and others write off Freud and Oedipus complex as irrelevant, they should re-read him carefully."

Midas: A person of great wealth or great moneymaking ability.
Internet Use: "The Midas Touch"

Hades: The underworld inhabited by departed souls. The abode or state of the dead; hell. The god ruling the underworld; Pluto.
Internet Use: "One poignant spot at the sanctuary is Kallichoron Well, where the goddess Demeter wept over the loss of her daughter, whom Hades (Pluto) spirited away."

Spartan: Brave; undaunted. Of or pertaining to Sparta or its people. Sggestive of the ancient Spartans; sternly disciplined and rigorously simple, frugal, or austere.
Internet Use: "It was clear where the money had been spent, and it wasn't in the spartan rooms. "

Titanic: Of, pertaining to, or characteristic of the Titans. Of enormous size, strentgth, power, etc; gigantic.
Internet Use: "The White Star liner Olympic reports by wireless this evening that the Cunarder Carpathia reached, at daybreak this morning, the position from which wireless calls for help were sent out last night by the Titanic after her collision with an iceberg." The boat was probably called Titanic because of its enormous size.

Marathon: A foot race over a course measuring 26 mi. 385 yd. (42 km 195 m). Any long-distance race.Any contest, event, or the like, of great, or greater than normal length or duration or requiring exceptional endurance.
Internet Use: "News about the New York City Marathon, including commentary and archival articles published in The New York Times."

miércoles, 26 de septiembre de 2007

Fallacies

China today is entering a really delicate phase on the climate-energy issue — the phase I like to call “The Wal-Mart environmental moment.” I wish the same could be said of America and President Bush.
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
Thomas L. Friedman

The “Wal-Mart environmental moment” starts with the C.E.O. adopting a green branding strategy as a purely defensive, public relations, marketing move. Then an accident happens — someone in the shipping department takes it seriously and comes up with a new way to package the latest product and saves $100,000. This gets the attention of the C.E.O., who turns to his P.R. adviser and says, “Well, isn’t that interesting? Get me a sustainability expert. Let’s do this some more.”

There are really no fallacies in this paragraph.

The company then hires a sustainability officer, and he starts showing how green design, manufacturing and materials can save money in other areas. Then the really smart C.E.O.’s realize they have to become their own C.E.O. — chief energy officer — and they start demanding that energy efficiency become core to everything the company does, from how its employees travel to how its products are manufactured.
That is the transition that Lee Scott, Wal-Mart’s C.E.O., has presided over in the past few years.

I don't see any fallacies in this paragraph eithe. The author is using all his points up to this moment very well.

Last July, Mr. Scott was visiting a Wal-Mart in Las Vegas on a day when the temperature was more than 100 degrees. He happened to notice that a Wal-Mart staple — inexpensive Styrofoam coolers — were not being promoted by the store’s associates. As Andrew Ruben, Wal-Mart’s vice president for sustainability, told me: “Lee walked into the store and said, ‘It’s 105 degrees. Why aren’t we selling any coolers?’ The associates said, ‘We don’t want to sell Styrofoam coolers because of their impact on the environment.’ So Lee called us afterwards and said: ‘We’re going to have to figure this out.’ By that he meant innovation of a different kind of cooler” that doesn’t come from petroleum-based Styrofoam, which is not biodegradable and usually not recycled.

There still aren't any fallacies that I have been able to detect so far. The author hasn't really tried convincing us of anything yet and is simply stating facts that will lead to his persuasion later on.

Wal-Mart on Monday also announced a partnership with the Carbon Disclosure Project (C.D.P.) to measure the amount of energy used to create products throughout its supply chain — many of which come from China.
Said C.D.P. Chief Executive Paul Dickinson: “Wal-Mart will encourage its suppliers to measure and manage their greenhouse gas emissions, and ultimately reduce the total carbon footprint of Wal-Mart’s indirect emissions. We look forward to other global corporations following Wal-Mart’s lead.”

The same case followed into this paragraph.

China’s leadership is not where Lee Scott is yet. Chinese officials still put their highest priority on growing G.D.P. — their bottom line. But for the first time, the costs of this breakneck growth are becoming so obvious on China’s air, glaciers and rivers that the leadership asked for briefings on global warming. Many Chinese mayors are looking to get clean-technology industries — like wind turbines and solar — started in their cities.
At such a key time, if the U.S. government adopted a real carbon-reducing strategy, as California and Wal-Mart have, rather than the obfuscations of the Bush team, it would have a huge impact on China and only trigger more innovation in America.

I don't see fallacies in these two paragraphs either. I guess it could use a little of the "Bandwagon" fallacy in saying that America needs to hop on the bandwagon because Wal-Mart and California are doing it.

Mr. Bush will be convening his climate photo op — oops, I mean “conference” — in Washington tomorrow, which will include Chinese and Indian officials. But, as Rob Watson, the C.E.O. of EcoTech International, which works on environmental issues in China put it: “The Chinese are not going to take anything we say seriously if we don’t set an example ourselves.”

I believe this could be a personal attack to President Bush. He is saying that being the person he is, Bush doesn't care about the climate and is only at the conference to look good.

David Moskovitz, who directs the Regulatory Assistance Project, a nonprofit that helps promote green policies in China, was even more blunt: “The most frequent and difficult question we get in China with every policy initiative we put forward is: ‘If it is so good, why aren’t you doing it?’ It’s hard to answer — and somewhat embarrassing. So we point to good examples that some American states, or cities, or companies are implementing — but not to the federal government. We can’t point to America.”

I cannot point out any fallacies in that paragraph either, and I am beginning to notice that the author is good enough that he doesn't really use fallacies.

Too bad. “It was America which put environmentalism on the world’s agenda in the 1970s and
’80s,” recalled Glenn Prickett, a senior vice president for Conservation International. “But since then, somehow, the wealthiest and most powerful country on the planet has gone to the back of the line.”

The author didn't commit any fallacies in this paragraph either.

Leadership is about “follow me” not “after you.” Getting our national climate regulations in order is necessary, but it will not be sufficient to move China. We have to show them what Wal-Mart is showing its competitors — that green is not just right for the world, it is better, more profitable, more healthy, more innovative, more efficient, more successful. If Wal-Mart can lead, and California can lead, why can’t America?

In this final paragraph, the author uses a lot of logic and no fallacies. Overall it was a perfectly written article with little to no fallacies if I am not mistaken.

martes, 25 de septiembre de 2007

Nisus and Scylla: Who are we?

I believe this myth answers the fundamental question of who we are. With Scylla's love for King Midas, we see all she is willing to give up in order to be with him, telling us that we are a people who will do anything for love, a reocurring theme in countless love stories. However, when Midas rejects her love, he doesn't take over the city. Even after being in war for so long, even when the gates to the city were handed to him, Midas' honor told him to leave. This tells us that while men are ambicious and vengful enough to go to war, there will always be honor in him. I believe that although it is a short myth, it has tought me more than a lot of the longer ones.

lunes, 24 de septiembre de 2007

Cupid and Psyche

Of all the love stories I have read so far, this is the most intriguing for many reasons. For starters, why didn't any human want to marry Psyche? Why was Venus so jealous?
Time and time again, humans "shoot themselves in the foot" with their curiosity. Cupid and Psyche is just another example of this, as Psyche almost gets herself killed by looking into Prosperine's box. Luckily, Cupid's love for her was extremely strong and he saved her.

Vertumnus and Pomona

I know these blogs are about analyzing the myths, but I couldn't help but realize where the modern supermarket Pomona, gets its name. I would never have thought that the name came from a Greek godess, and I was really surprised as I read. Once I knew that she was the goddes of fruit and that cultivating fruit was her passion, however, it was really easy to understand why it was chosen as the name for this Colombian supermarket.
Also, I am glad that finally someone was able to marry one of the virgin goddesses. In past myths that I have read, Diana, and several other nymphs whose names escape me, have all run away from love. Pomona on the other hand, gave in to the words of Vertumnus and they lived happily.

Glaucus and Scylla

Last year and this year in Spanish, my class and I have read The Odyssey. Personally, I think that it is a great book and I can see why it is one of the most important pieces of literature we have. However, although we are given a basic explenation of all the obstacles Odysseus encounters, the epic lacks the roots of some of his obstacles. Scylla, as I learned from this myth, was once one of the most desired nymphs on the Earth and she was extremely beautiful. I find it cool to know how she was transformed into such a horrible monster and I hope to find the roots of more characters I know.

miércoles, 19 de septiembre de 2007

Three kinds of rhetoric...

Doha and Dalian
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: September 19, 2007
Dalian, China

In the last few weeks, I happened to visit Doha and Dalian, and I must say: I was stunned.
Before explaining why, let me acknowledge that chances are you’ve not visited Doha or Dalian recently. Indeed, it may be — I presume nothing — that you have never heard of either city. Doha is the capital of Qatar, a tiny state east of Saudi Arabia. Dalian is in northeast China and is one of China’s Silicon Valleys because of its proliferation of software parks and its dynamic, techie mayor, Xia Deren. What was stunning is that I hadn’t been to either city for more than three years, and I barely recognized either one.
In Doha, since I was last there, a skyline that looks like a mini-Manhattan has sprouted from the desert. Whatever construction cranes are not in China must be in Doha today. This once sleepy harbor now has a profile of skyscrapers, thanks to a huge injection of oil and gas revenues. Dalian, with six million people, already had a mini-Manhattan when I was last here. It seems to have grown two more since — including a gleaming new convention complex built on a man-made peninsula.
But this, alas, is not a travel column. It’s an energy column. If you want to know why I remain a climate skeptic — not a skeptic about climate change, but a skeptic that we’re going to be able to mitigate it — it’s partly because of Doha and Dalian. Can you imagine how much energy all these new skyscrapers in just two cities you’ve never heard of are going to consume and how much CO2 they are going to emit?
I am not blaming them. It is a blessing that their people are growing out of poverty. And, after all, they’re just following the high-energy growth model pioneered by America. We’re still the world’s biggest energy hogs, but we’re now producing carbon copies in places you’ve never heard of.
Yes, “Americans” are popping up all over now — people who once lived low-energy lifestyles but by dint of oil wealth or hard work are now moving into U.S.-style apartments, cars and appliances.
Our planet cannot tolerate so many “Americans,” unless we take the lead and change what it means to be an American in energy terms. Attention Kmart shoppers: the world consumed about 66.6 million barrels a day of oil in 1990. We’re now consuming 83 million barrels a day.
“Demand for oil has grown 22 percent in the U.S. since 1990. China’s oil demand has grown nearly 200 percent in this same period,” Margo Oge, director of the Environmental Protection Agency’s office of transportation and air quality, told the Tianjin China Green Car conference that I attended. “By 2030, the global thirst for oil is forecast to increase by another 40 percent if we maintain business as usual.” Such an appetite would devour every incremental green initiative we make.
Hey, I’m really glad you switched to long-lasting compact fluorescent light bulbs in your house. But the growth in Doha and Dalian ate all your energy savings for breakfast. I’m glad you bought a hybrid car. But Doha and Dalian devoured that before noon. I am glad that the U.S. Congress is debating whether to bring U.S. auto mileage requirements up to European levels by 2020. Doha and Dalian will have those gains for lunch — maybe just the first course. I’m glad that solar and wind power are “soaring” toward 2 percent of U.S. energy generation, but Doha and Dalian will devour all those gains for dinner. I am thrilled that you are now doing the “20 green things” suggested by your favorite American magazine. Doha and Dalian will snack on them all, like popcorn before bedtime.
But, as I said, this is not just about “them.” It is still very much about us. Peter Bakker is the chief executive of TNT, the biggest express delivery company in Europe. The Dow Jones Sustainability Index 2007 just listed TNT as the No. 1 company in terms of energy and environmental practices. Mr. Bakker, whom I met in China, told me this story:
“We operate 35,000 trucks and 48 aircraft in Europe. We just bought two Boeing 747s, which, when fully operational, will do nine round trips every week between our home base in Liège [Belgium] and Shanghai. They leave Liège only partly full and every day fly back to Europe as full as you can stuff them with iPods and computers. By our calculations, just these two 747s will use as much fuel each week as our 48 other aircraft combined and emit as much CO2.”
That’s why we’re fooling ourselves. There is no green revolution, or, if there is, the counter-revolution is trumping it at every turn. Without a transformational technological breakthrough in the energy space, all of the incremental gains we’re making will be devoured by the exponential growth of all the new and old “Americans.”

1.)"We’re still the world’s biggest energy hogs, but we’re now producing carbon copies in places you’ve never heard of." This is using BLAME, telling us that the United States is responsible for all these places creating sky scrapers and living energy consuming lives when they didn't before.

2.) "Hey, I’m really glad you switched to long-lasting compact fluorescent light bulbs in your house. But the growth in Doha and Dalian ate all your energy savings for breakfast. I’m glad you bought a hybrid car. But Doha and Dalian devoured that before noon. I am glad that the U.S. Congress is debating whether to bring U.S. auto mileage requirements up to European levels by 2020. Doha and Dalian will have those gains for lunch — maybe just the first course. I’m glad that solar and wind power are “soaring” toward 2 percent of U.S. energy generation, but Doha and Dalian will devour all those gains for dinner. I am thrilled that you are now doing the “20 green things” suggested by your favorite American magazine. Doha and Dalian will snack on them all, like popcorn before bedtime." I believe this uses VALUES because it is telling us that what we are doing is not enough, and thus the values that we are living with aren't working towards a "green" Earth. It attacks our feelings and makes us think that we need to drastically change our values.

3.)"Without a transformational technological breakthrough in the energy space, all of the incremental gains we’re making will be devoured by the exponential growth of all the new and old “Americans." While this doesn't directly deal with CHOICE, I believe it takes us towards a reflection which does. By reading this we basically are being asked to choose to either change how we consume energy drastically, or allow our country to keep hogging energy and resources and thus creating copies in other places.

martes, 18 de septiembre de 2007

Greed, Greed, Greed

The story of King Midas has been heard in many different ways around the world. We've all been taught not to be greedy and to value other things in life other than money. Apparently, almost no one has listened and a majority of the world's population is completely obsessed with money and riches. In this they are no different than King Midas, who had the chance to have anything he wanted, but asked for gold. We should learn from this story and start valuing things in life other than money. Things like family, friendships, knowledge, music, and art. If not, we will become over-obsessed with money and though we will not turn things into gold, we can ruin our lives very easily.

Listen to your parents!

This day and age, nothing as bad as setting the Earth and Heavens on fire can result from not listening to your parents. However, it is the lesson that Phaeton's myth teaches us, that is the important part of the story. Ever since we were born, the lesson of listening to one's parents has been shoved down our throats, but for an important reason. Sometimes, although we may not like it, it is crucial for us to hear what our parents tell us. In this case, Apollo insisted that Phaeton didn't ride the chariot of fire, but Phaeton begged and begged and finally Apollo resisted. This can also teach us not to spoil kids. If Apollo would've simply said no to his mortal son, the entire thing would have been avoided. The same thing applies when parents give their kids all they want, and even though they don't set the Earth on fire, they can become terrible people because of it.

Pyramus and Thisbe or Romeo and Juliet?

After every Greek myth I read, I begin to understand that it is indeed, as all my teachers have taught me since 4th grade, the basis of western civilization. From previous myths, I have seen that many religious stories are based on these myths, and after reading Pyramus and Thisbe, I recognize that literature has also taken a big part from Greek mythology. Pyramus and Thisbe is pretty much the same exact story as the most famous play ever written: Romeo and Juliet. Is it just coincidence, or did Shakespeare know of this myth when he wrote the play? Being the most famous writer of the time, Shakespeare had to be familiar with Greek mythology, and thus, I believe he based Romeo and Juliet on Pyramus and Thisbe. I am not taking anything away from Shakespeare, however, as I have personally read Romeo and Juliet, and believe that it is fantastic. You do have to ask yourself though, do all great things in theater and literature come from the Greeks, or is there imagination somewhere down the line?

Prometheus and Pandora

I believe that this myth is another example of Judeo-Christian religion sharing stories with literature from other cultures. While creation is different in Greek mythology than the Torah, the story of Noah's ark, is this time exactly the same. In Greek mythology, Zeus decides to drown the world and kill all the humans for behaving badly and being bad people. In the Torah, Hashem(God) decides to drown the world for the exact same reason. I am not saying that the Torah stole the flood story from the Greeks because the Greeks came after. However,why has monotheism thrived while the stories are exactly the same? Why has polytheism dissapeared? Why believe one and not the other? In fact, I think it is much cooler to believe in a god for every aspect of life than only one. The more the merrier no?